Kimmer Coppejans vs Marc Polmans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W W L
Form
L L L W L L W L W LHead-To-Head: Coppejans 1 - 1 Polmans
They have played 5 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 2 and Polmans winning 3. The last match between Coppejans and Polmans was at the Bengalaru 1 Challenger, 07-02-2022, First, Hard with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 1-6 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimmer Coppejans | 1 |
| Marc Polmans | 1 |
Bengalaru 1 Challenger(07-02-2022)
1
6
6
2
6
4
| Coppejans | Stats | Polmans |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (23-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (3-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 280 | Ranking | 428 |
| 97 | Highest Rank | 116 |
| 31 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 13 |
| 59% (468-330) | Career Total W/L | 55% (344-281) |
| $294,830 | Career Prize Money | $642,775 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Marc Polmans
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
27%
(
8 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 18 | Games Won | 24 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:41:6 | Average Match Time | 1:41:6 |
| 60% (71/119) | 1st Serve % | 74% (100/135) |
| 68% (48/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (62/100) |
| 29% (14/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (19/35) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 90% (9/10) |
| 40% (54/135) | Return Points Win % | 48% (57/119) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dominic Stricker
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Norbert Gombos
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Tiago Pereira
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Radu Albot
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
56%
(
67 of
120)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Izan Corretja
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Marc Polmans
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
James Tracy
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karl Poling
Player
Marc Polmans
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Marc Polmans
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Marc Polmans
73%
(
93 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
82 of
116)
20
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
63 of
82)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
41 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
40 of
116)
126
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Jack Bruce-Smith
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Marc Polmans
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Marc Polmans
44%
(
17 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
41
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Marc Polmans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (468/330) | Win/Loss | 55% (344/281) |
| 56% (1064/839) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (795/683) |
| 53% (9378/8436) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7210/6720) |
| 62% (140/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (203/162) |
| 61% (308/198) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (98/75) |
| 32% (17/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46% (16/19) |
| 25% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (27/25) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2143 | Aces Total | 1777 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1801 | Total Double Faults | 1801 |
| 1:28:45 | Average Match Time | 1:32:18 |
| 219.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.84 |
| 65% (31296/48499) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25757/39364) |
| 67% (21007/31296) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (17445/25757) |
| 49% (8361/17203) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6756/13607) |
| 44% (2355/5411) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1722/4042) |
| 42% (20811/49653) | Return Points Win % | 40% (16082/39872) |
| 52% (34/31) | Slam W/L | 40% (23/34) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 33% (3/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 28% (11/29) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (19/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (293/220) | Challenger W/L | 50% (159/156) |
| 75% (127/43) | Futures W/L | 71% (140/58) |
| 59% (462/785) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (333/602) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 55% (117/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (91/186) |
| 57% (169/297) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (112/214) |
| 84% (435/364) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (339/287) |
| 16% (435/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (339/52) |
| 28% (363/103) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (284/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
